1. The State of the World’s Midwifery 2011: Delivering Health,
Saving Lives. USA: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA);
2011.
2. Lankarani NB, Azin A, Sadighi J, Jahangiri K, Aeenparast A,
Omidvari S, et al. Chronic diseases in a population-based study:
Iranian health perception survey (IHPS). Payesh 2011;10:391-5.
3. World Health Organization. Quality, Equity, Dignity: The
Network to Improve Quality of Care for Maternal, Newborn
and Child Health––Strategic Objectives. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2018
4. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J,
Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al. Midwifery and quality care:
Findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal
and newborn care. Lancet 2014;384:1129-45.
5. Oladapo OT, Iyaniwura CA, Sule-Odu AO. Quality of antenatal
services at the primary care level in southwest Nigeria. Afr J
Reprod Health 2008;12:71-92.
6. Bohren MA, Titiloye MA, Kyaddondo D, Hunter EC,
Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Defining quality of care during
childbirth from the perspectives of Nigerian and Ugandan
women: A qualitative study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;139:4-16.
7. Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, Vogel JP,
Rashidian A, Nogueira Pileggi V, et al. Respectful care during
childbirth in health facilities globally: A qualitative evidence
synthesis. Bjog 2018;125:932-42.
8. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: Updated
methodology. J Adv Nurs 2005;52:546-53.
9. Broome ME, Lillis PP, Smith MC. Pain interventions with
children: A meta-analysis of research. Nurs Res 1989;38:154-8.
10. Ganong LH. Integrative reviews of nursing research. Res Nurs
Health 1987;10:1-11.
11. Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F,
Cargo M, et al. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT)
version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ
Inform 2018;34:285-91.
12. Oates J, Topping A, Arias T, Charles P, Hunter C, Watts K.
The mental health and wellbeing of midwifery students: An
integrative review. Midwifery 2019;72:80-9.
13. Pezaro S, Clyne W, Fulton EA. A systematic mixed-methods
review of interventions, outcomes and experiences for midwives
and student midwives in work-related psychological distress.
Midwifery 2017;50:163-73.
14. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F,
Feder G, et al.; AGREE Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II:
Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in
health care. CMAJ 2010;182:E839-42.
15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC,
Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting
systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate
health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Plos Med
2009;6:e1000100.
16. Mgawadere F, Smith H, Asfaw A, Lambert J, Broek NVD.
“There is no time for knowing each other”: Quality of care during
childbirth in a low resource setting. Midwifery 2019;75:33-40.
17. Munabi-Babigumira S, Glenton C, Willcox M, Nabudere H.
Ugandan health workers’ and mothers’ views and experiences of
the quality of maternity care and the use of informal solutions:
A qualitative study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213511.
18. Mohale H, Sweet L, Graham K. Maternity health care: The
experiences of sub-Saharan African women in sub-Saharan
Africa and Australia. Women Birth 2017;30:298-307.
19. Ndirima Z, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C. Listening to their voices:
Understanding rural women’s perceptions of good delivery care
at the Mibilizi district hospital in Rwanda. BMC Women Health
2018;18:38.
20. Deliktas Demirci A, Kabukcuglu K, Haugan G, Aune I. “I want
a birth without interventions”: Women’s childbirth experiences
from turkey. Women Birth 2019;32:e515-22.
21. Jolly Y, Aminu M, Mgawadere F, van den Broek N. “We are
the ones who should make the decision”: Knowledge and
understanding of the rights-based approach to maternity care
among women and healthcare providers. BMC Preg Childbirth
2019;19:42.22. Shimoda K, Horiuchi S, Leshabari S, Shimpuku Y. Midwives’
respect and disrespect of women during facility-based childbirth in
urban Tanzania: A qualitative study. Reprod Health 2018;15:8.
23. Raven J, van den Broek N, Tao F, Kun H, Tolhurst R. The quality
of childbirth care in China: Women’s voices: A qualitative study.
BMC Preg Childbirth 2015;15:113.
24. Afulani PA, Kirumbi L, Lyndon A. What makes or mars the
facility-based childbirth experience: Thematic analysis of
women’s childbirth experiences in western Kenya. Reprod
Health 2017;14:180.
25. Berg M, Asta Ólafsdóttir O, Lundgren I. A midwifery model
of woman-centred childbirth care–in Swedish and Icelandic
settings. Sex Reprod Healthc 2012;3:79-87.
26. Paula C, Butler M, Martina M, Ann R. Exploring women’s
experiences of care in labour. Evid Based Midwifery 2014;12:89-
94.
27. Jenkins MG, Ford JB, Morris JM, Roberts CL. Women’s
expectations and experiences of maternity care in NSW: What
women highlight as most important. Women Birth 2014;27:214-
9.
28. Afaya A, Yakong VN, Afaya RA, Salia SM, Adatara P, Kuug AK,
et al. A qualitative study on women’s experiences of intrapartum
nursing care at tamale teaching hospital (TTH), Ghana. J Caring
Sci 2017;6:303-14.
29. Dahlberg U, Persen J, Skogås AK, Selboe ST, Torvik HM,
Aune I. How can midwives promote a normal birth and a
positive birth experience? The experience of first-time Norwegian
mothers. Sex Reprod Healthc 2016;7:2-7.
30. World Health Organization. Recommendations on Intrapartum
Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2018. Available from: http://apps.who.
int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.
pdf;jsessionid=172A8E944D20DFD3B4D6FF3756189A86?
sequence=1. [Last accessed on 2021 Aug 10].
31. ACOG. Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to
limit intervention during labor and birth. Obstet Gynecol
2019;133:e164-e73.
32. Baldisserotto ML, Theme Filha MM, da Gama SG. Good
practices according to WHO’S recommendation for normal
labor and birth and women’s assessment of the care received:
The “birth in brazil” national research study, 2011/2012. Reprod
Health 2016;13:124.
33. Homer CS, Passant L, Brodie PM, Kildea S, Leap N,
Pincombe J, et al. The role of the midwife in Australia: Views of
women and midwives. Midwifery 2009;25:673-81.
34. Cipolletta S, Balasso S. When everything seems right: The first
birth experience of women in an Italian hospital. J Reprod Infant
Psychol 2011;29:374-81.
35. Goberna-Tricas J, Banús-Giménez MR, Palacio-Tauste A,
Linares-Sancho S. Satisfaction with pregnancy and birth services:
The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women.
Midwifery 2011;27:e231-7.
36. Kyaddondo D, Mugerwa K, Byamugisha J, Oladapo OT,
Bohren MA. Expectations and needs of Ugandan women
for improved quality of childbirth care in health facilities:
A qualitative study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;139:38-46.
37. Attarha M, Keshavarz Z, Bakhtiari M, Jamilian M. The outcome
of midwife-mother relationship in delivery room: A qualitative
content analysis. Health 2016;8:336.
38. Mohseni M, Bahadoran P, Abedi H. The quality of postpartum
care from mothers’ viewpoint. Hakim Res J 2009;12:27-34.
39. Askari F, Atarodi A, Torabi S, Delshad Noghabi A,
Sadegh Moghadam L, Rahmani R. Women’s labor experience:
A phenomenological study. Horizon Med Sci 2010;15:39-46.
40. Moridi M, Pazandeh F, Hajian S, Potrata B. Midwives’
perspectives of respectful maternity care during childbirth:
A qualitative study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0229941.
41. Iravani M, Janghorbani M, Zarean E, Bahrami M. An overview
of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2015;20:293-303.
42. Nove A, Hoope-Bender PT, Moyo NT, Bokosi M. The midwifery
services framework: What is it, and why is it needed? Midwifery
2018;57:54-8.
43. Srivastava A, Avan BI, Rajbangshi P, Bhattacharyya S.
Determinants of women’s satisfaction with maternal health care:
A review of literature from developing countries. BMC Preg
Childbirth 2015;15:97.
44. Kennedy HP, Rousseau AL, Low LK. An exploratory
metasynthesis of midwifery practice in the United States.
Midwifery 2003;19:203-14.
45. World Health Organization. Standards for Improving Quality
of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities. Geneva;
2016 [internet]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/249155/1/9789241511216eng.pdf. [Last
accessed on 2017 Aug 10].
46. ICM. Core Document; Philosophy and Model of Midwifery
Care; 2014. Available from: http://www.internationalmidwives.
org/assets/uploads/documents/CoreDocuments/CD2005. [Last
accessed on 2016 Jul 10].
47. Corcoran PM, Catling C, Homer CS. Models of midwifery care
for indigenous women and babies: A meta-synthesis. Women
Birth 2017;30:77-86.
48. Moghasemi S, Vedadhir A, Simbar M. Models for providing
midwifery care and its challenges in the context of Iran. J Holist
Nurs Midwifery 2018;28:64-74.
49. Jamas MT, Hoga LA, Tanaka AC. Mothers’ birth care
experiences in a Brazilian birth centre. Midwifery 2011;27:693-
9.
50. Behruzi R, Hatem M, Goulet L, Fraser WD. Perception of
humanization of birth in a highly specialized hospital: Let’s think
differently. Health Care Women Int 2014;35:127-48.
51. Cooper H. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature
Reviews. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
52. Bolderston A, Lewis D, Chai MJ. The concept of caring:
Perceptions of radiation therapists. Radiography 2010;16:198-
208.
53. Guittier MJ, Cedraschi C, Jamei N, Boulvain M, Guillemin F.
Impact of mode of delivery on the birth experience in firsttime mothers: A qualitative study. BMC Preg Childbirth
2014;14:254.
54. Sorkin DH, Ngo-Metzger Q, De Alba I. Racial/ethnic
discrimination in health care: Impact on perceived quality of
care. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:390-6.
55. Page LA, McCandlish R. The New Midwifery E-book: Science
and Sensitivity in Practice. 2nd ed. Elsevier Health Sciences:
Netherlands; 2006.
56. Solnes Miltenburg A, Lambermon F, Hamelink C, Meguid T.
Maternity care and human rights: What do women think? BMC
Int Health Hum Rights 2016;16:17.
57. Contreras JAH, Hernández MDE, Ponce AMG. Quality
assessment in the service area of expertise in an institution of
public health sector. Open J Soc Sci 2015;3:50-3.