Development and psychometric evaluation of the Spiritual Health Questionnaire among Iranian Muslim adults


1 Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Research Center of Quran, Hadith and Medicine, Spiritual Health Group, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Background: Spiritual health (SH) has received great attention from nurses and other health-care providers in recent years. The existing instruments for SH measurement measure either some aspects of SH or SH-related concepts, and there is no specific SH measurement instrument, particularly for Muslim adults in Iran. Objective: This study aimed at the development and psychometric evaluation of the Spiritual Health Questionnaire (SHQ). Methods: This exploratory sequential mixed methods study was conducted in a qualitative and a quantitative phase in 2014–2016. In the qualitative phase, a concept analysis was conducted using the hybrid model and its results were used to develop the primary SHQ. In the quantitative phase, the face, content, and construct validity and reliability of SHQ were assessed. Exploratory factor analysis and concurrent validity assessment were performed for construct validity assessment. Test–retest stability and internal consistency were also assessed for reliability assessment. Results: The qualitative phase of the study showed that the concept of SH had six main components. In the quantitative phase, the number of primary SHQ items was reduced from 88 to 59 after face and content validity assessments. In construct validity assessment, 12 more items were excluded and the remaining 47 items were loaded on six factors which explained 45.2% of the total variance. The Cronbach’s alpha values of the questionnaire and its six dimensions were 0.778 and 0.752–0.788, respectively. Convergent validity assessment showed that the mean scores of SHQ and the Spiritual Well-Being Index had a significant correlation with each other (r = 0.35; P = 0.032). Conclusion: The 47-item SHQ is a specific instrument for SH assessment with acceptable validity and reliability.


1. Kyngäs H. Theory development from the results of content
analysis. In: Kyngäs H, Mikkonen K, Kääriäinen M, editors.
The application of content analysis in nursing science research.
Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 73-84.
2. McEwen M, Wills EM. Theoretical Basis for Nursing: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
3. Potter PA, Perry AG, Stockert P, Hall A. Fundamentals of
Nursing-E-Book. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020.
4. Shaygan M, Shayegan L. Understanding the relationship between
spiritual well-being and depression in chronic pain patients:
The mediating role of pain catastrophizing. Pain Manag Nurs
5. Vizehfar F, Jaberi A. The relationship between religious beliefs
and quality of life among patients with multiple sclerosis. J Relig
Health 2017;56:1826-36.
6. Momennasab M, Shadfard Z, Jaberi A, Najafi SS, Hosseini FN.
The effect of group reflection on nursing students’ spiritual wellbeing and attitude toward spiritual care: A randomized controlled
trial. Invest Educ Enferm 2019;37:e09.
7. Selman L, Siegert R, Harding R, Gysels M, Speck P,
Higginson IJ. A psychometric evaluation of measures of
spirituality validated in culturally diverse palliative care
populations. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;42:604-22.
8. Gall TL, Malette J, Guirguis-Younger M. Spirituality and
religiousness: A diversity of definitions. J Spirit Mental Health
9. Ellison CW. Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and
measurement. J Psychol Theol 1983;11:330-40.
10. Fisher J. Development and application of a spiritual well-being
questionnaire called SHALOM. Relig 2010;1:105-21.
11. Daaleman TP, Frey BB. The Spirituality Index of Well-Being:
A new instrument for health-related quality-of-life research. Ann
Fam Med 2004;2:499-503.
12. The-WHOQOL-Group. The World Health Organization Quality
of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general
psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1569-85.
13. Koenig HG, Al-Shohaib S. Health and Well-Being in Islamic
Societies. New York: Springer; 2015.
14. Squires A, Aiken LH, van den Heede K, Sermeus W, Bruyneel L,
Lindqvist R, et al. A systematic survey instrument translation
process for multi-country, comparative health workforce studies.
Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:264-73.
15. Abbasi M, Azizi F, Shamsi-Gooshki E, Naseri Rad M,
Akbari Lake M. Conceptual definition and operationalization
of spiritual health: A methodological study. Iranian J Med Ethic
16. Khorami-Markani A, Yaghmaie F, Khodayari-Fard M,
Alavi Majd H. Developing a measure for assessing oncology
nurses’ attitudes toward providing spiritual care: Psychometric
properties. Payesh 2013;12:393-402.
17. Ghobari-Bonab B, Lavasani Gh, Mohammadi MR. Developing
a spiritual experience scale for college students. J Psychol
18. Iranmanesh S, Tirgari B, Cheraghi MA. Developing and testing a
spiritual care questionnaire in the Iranian context. J Relig Health
19. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Zehtabchi S. Developing and validating
an instrument to assess the nurses’ professional competence in
spiritual care. J Nurs Meas 2016;24:15-27.
20. Sayehmiri K, Taghinejad H, Tavan H, MousaviMoghaddam R,
Mohammadi I, Ahmadi Z. Validation study of spiritual health
questionnaire from Islamic view. Med Sci J Islamic Azad Univ
21. Jaberi A, Momennasab M, Yektatalab S, Ebadi A, Cheraghi MA.
Spiritual health: A Concept analysis. J Relig Health
22. Waltz CF, Strickland Ol, Lenz ER. Measurement in Nursing
and Health Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company;
23. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity
ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Meas
Evaluat Couns Devel 2014;47:79-86.
24. Presidency of the IRI Plan and Budget Organization. National
Population and Housing Statistics. Iran-Tehran: Presidency of the
IRI Plan and Budget Organization; 2015.
25. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT. Exploratory Factor Analysis.
New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
26. Ebadi A, Zarshenas L, Rakhshan M. Principles of Scale
Development in Health Science. 1st ed. Tehran: Jame-e-Negar;
27. Bufford RK, Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW. Norms for the spiritual
well-bing scale. J Psychol Theol 1991;19:45-70.
28. Dehshiri GH, Sohrabi F, Jafari E, Najafi M. Psychometric
assessment of Spiritual well-being Scale in college students.
Psychol Stud 2008;16:129-45.
29. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement
Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, USA; 2015.
30. Plichta SB, Kelvin EA, Munro BH. Munro’s Statistical Methods
for Health Care Research. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
31. Jaberi A, Momennasab M, Cheraghi M, Yektatalab S, Ebadi A.
Spiritual health as experienced by Muslim adults in Iran:
A qualitative content analysis. Shiraz E Med J 2019;20:e88715.
32. Amiri P, Abbasi M, Gharibzadeh S, Asghari Jafarabadi M,
HamzaviZarghani N, Azizi F. Designation and psychomteric
assessment of a comperehensive spiritual health quastionnaire for
Iranian population. Iranian J Med Ethic 2015;8:25-55.
33. Underwood LG. The daily spiritual experience scale: Overview
and results. Relig 2011;2:29-50.
34. Unterrainer HF, Ladenhauf KH, Moazedi ML,
Wallner-Liebmann SJ, Fink A. Dimensions of religious/spiritual
well-being and their relation to personality and psychological
well-being. Pers Indiv Diff 2010;49:192-7.
35. Hedstrom M. The Construction of “Judeo-Christian” Spirituality
in Postwar America 2013. Available from: http://citation. [Last accessed on
2015 Feb 11].
Volume 10, Issue 3
July 2021
Pages 194-202
  • Receive Date: 11 September 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 September 2022
  • First Publish Date: 11 September 2022