Challenges of the sudden shift to asynchronous virtual education in nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

Authors

Patient Safety Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Background: The global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has led many institutions and universities around the world to bring about a sudden shift to virtual education to continue their educational activities. Objectives: This study aimed to explain the challenges of the sudden shift to asynchronous virtual education in nursing education throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted during 2020, on nursing faculty members and undergraduate nursing students in the Urmia School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran. A total of 12 faculty members and 8 students were enrolled in the study using purposive sampling. Data were collected using semi-structured face-to-face interviews and then analyzed through the content analysis method. Results: Participants identified “inappropriate groundwork” and “low inclination to virtual education” as the main challenges of the sudden shift to asynchronous e-learning in nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: The authorities of nursing schools should provide the appropriate groundwork for virtual education by the provision and upgrading of the required hardware and software, teaching how to use the facilities, and developing standard protocols for virtual education.

Keywords


1.     Wong LP, Alias H, Danaee M, Ziaee M, Abedi F, Ziaee A, et al.
Uncovering psychobehavioural implications of SARS-CoV-2
infection in Iran. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020;67:2892-900.
2.     Alvarez A Jr. The phenomenon of learning at a distance through
emergency remote teaching amidst the pandemic crisis. Asian J
Dist Educ 2020;15:144-53.
3.     Elhadary T, Elhaty IA, Mohamed AA, Alawna M. Evaluation
of academic performance of science and social science students
in Turkish Universities during Covid-19 crisis. J Crit Rev
2020;7:1740-51.
4.     Al Lily AE, Ismail AF, Abunasser FM, Alhajhoj Alqahtani RH.
Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and
Arab culture. Technol Soc 2020;63:101317.
5.     Gaur R, Mudgal SK, Dharni I, Sharma R, Suyal N. Barriers
encountered during online classes among undergraduate nursing
students during COVID-19 pandemic in India. Int J Res Med Sci
2020;8:3687-93.
6.     Cutri RM, Mena J. A critical reconceptualization of faculty
readiness for online teaching. Distance Educ 2020;41:361-80.
7.     Arora AK, Srinivasan R. Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the
teaching–learning process: A study of higher education teachers.
Prabandhan: Ind J Manage 2020;13:43-56.
8.     Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. J Am
Med Assoc 2020;323:2131-2.
9.     Rehman R, Fatima SS. An innovation in flipped class room:
A teaching model to facilitate synchronous and asynchronous
learning during a pandemic. Pak J Med Sci 2021;37:131-6.
10.     Iancu AM, Kemp MT, Alam HB. Unmuting medical students’
education: Utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic
and beyond. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e19667.
11.     Dhawan S. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19
crisis. J Educ Tech Sys 2020;49:5-22.
12.     Subedi S, Nayaju S, Subedi S, Shah SK, Shah JM. Impact of
E-learning during COVID-19 pandemic among nursing students
and teachers of Nepal. Inter J Sci Healthcare Res 2020;5:68-76.13.     Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in
nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve
trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105-12.
14.     Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic
inquiries. ECTJ 1981;29:75-91.
15.     Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Exploring the critical
challenges and factorsinfluencing theE-learning systemusage during
COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inform Technol 2020;25:5261-80.
16.     Alanazi AA, Alshaalan ZM. Views of faculty members on the use
of e-learning in Saudi medical and health colleges during COVID19 pandemic. J Nat Sci Med 2020;3:308-17.
17.     Shafiei Sarvestani M, Mohammadi M,Afshin J, Raeisy L. Students’
experiences of e-Learning challenges: A phenomenological study.
Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci 2019;10:1-10.
18.     Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM, Obeidat K, Al-Balas H,
Aborajooh EA, et al. Distance learning in clinical medical
education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: Current situation,
challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:1-7.
19.     Khyzer E, Aftab T. Students’ perceptions about current use,
effectiveness and barriers in implementation of interactive learning
at College of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar. Int J
Med Res Health Sci 2019;8:12-6.
20.     Azizi Shamami M, Jafari Karafestani Z, Abedini Baltork M.
The study of relationship between attitude to e-learning and
self-regulation with academic achievement of students in
Babol University of Medical Sciences. J Med Educ Develop
2017;12:114-27.
21.     Oyadeyi JB. An assessment of computer anxiety among distance
learning freshmen in South Western Nigeria. KIU J Soc Sci
2018;4:151-9.
22.     Kian M. Challenges of virtual education: A report of what are not
learned. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci 2014;5:11-21.
23.     Sekhon MSK, Patil S. Student engagement in traditional learning
vs online learning—A comparative study. PalArch’s J Archaeol
Egypt 2021;18:2134-47.
24.     Lu H. Online learning: The meanings of student engagement. Educ
J 2020;9:73-9.
25.     O’Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J,
McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical
education—An integrative review. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:130.